User Views On The Complex Accounting For Financial Instruments

Main Article Content

Chyi Woan Tan
Greg Tower
Phil Hancock
Ross Taplin

Keywords

Abstract

This paper examines Australian and Singaporean users’ views on fair value accounting for all financial instruments in financial institutions via a survey on various aspects of contention in this debate. Overall, users showed general support for fair value accounting for all financial instruments. In addition, the findings revealed that users will support fair value accounting so long as there is no perceived difference between the banking and trading books, fair values of non-traded financial instruments are reliable and volatility in earnings will not be misunderstood. It was also found that user experience increases the level of support for the proposed fair value accounting model. These results highlight actual user preferences with noticeable support for arguments from both sides of the debate (JWG and JWGBA) in this highly contentious and topical area of accounting for financial instruments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 181 | PDF Downloads 228