Reinvestment Bias When Analyzing Mutually Exclusive Assets

Abstract

Capital budgeting decisions generally involve the commitment of resources in the current period to secure positive cash flows over time that generate a rate of return in excess of the cost of the funds invested.  The most common techniques used to perform this analysis are the Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

 Conceptually, these two techniques are substitutable; i.e. the resulting decision from a NPV analysis is identical to the decision from an IRR analysis.  In practice, however, the NPV and the IRR can, on occasion, produce conflicting decisions.  Specifically, when analyzing mutually exclusive assets the Net Present Value can support one asset while the Internal Rate of Return supports the other.  The purpose of this paper is twofold; first, to highlight structural deficiencies in the conventional application of the NPV and the IRR, and second, to demonstrate a procedure to correct for these structural errors.