The Use Of Statistical Sampling And A Single-Point Estimator To Establish Punitive Fines In Compliance Auditing: A Cautionary Note
Main Article Content
Keywords
audit sampling, sampling risk, confidence intervals, compliance audit, projected values
Abstract
This paper describes current practices relating to statistical sampling used by auditors performing compliance audits. An example audit case is presented where a compliance audit is performed using statistical sampling. Fines for non-compliance are based upon the sample results. While the practice is quite common and generally accepted, there are significant ramifications associated with the use of a single-point estimator. Approximately half of the time, an auditee will be charged more than is actually deserved. We explore the shortcomings associated with the use of a single-point estimator and the appropriateness of the use of a one-tailed confidence interval to provide greater assurance that fines are appropriate and reasonable.